Globe_48x48

5 lbs in 10 weeks

Subscribe to 5 lbs in 10 weeks 14 post(s), 6 voice(s)
Voices: AGo89, davidolson22, ThriveFit, amclouse, arnthorla, and lizanneh

Oct 9, 2009 11:05am

AGo89 AGo89
21 posts

My boyfriend gets back from Japan in 10 weeks and I’d really like to lose 5 lbs by then. I’ve been trying for a while and haven’t lost an ounce. Here are my stats:

5’2", 110 lbs. very small frame GW: 105 lbs
activity: walk maybe 1/2 mile per day to classes, etc.; MWF 5-7 mile runs, TU/TH: HIIT (just started this week), SAT: 10 mile run

Calories: (loosely counting so could be inaccurate) 1200-1500 per day.

Any ideas as to why I haven’t lost? And some tips to help me lose this 5?

 
Oct 9, 2009 1:26pm

davidolson22 davidolson22
131 posts

1st Qtr 2010 Most Weight Lifted I Lost 5%

You probably have very little muscle, I’d guess. I’d recommend adding some weight training a couple days a week.

 
Oct 9, 2009 1:54pm

AGo89 AGo89
21 posts

I’m actually extremely muscular…I was a gymnast for 16 years haha.
My body fat percentage is roughly 15…is that why its so hard to lose?

 
Oct 9, 2009 2:08pm

ThriveFit ThriveFit
1015 posts

I Ran 100 Miles! I Walked 100 Miles! I Did 1,000 Pushups! I Lost 5 Lbs! Conqueror I Burned 50K Calories! Queen of upper body fitness! Elliptiqueen I Burned 25K Calories! Conqueror I Biked 100 Miles! Got Fit W/Adrianna!!! I Burned 5,000 Calories!

You sound like you are in great shape and your stats look good. Is there some reason why these 5lbs are bothering you or a particular goal (other than lose the 5lbs) that is driving you?

With that said, drink plenty of water and keep your sodium intake low so you don’t mistake water retention for fat gain. Eat quality foods and stay active. Journal your food and measure everything so you aren’t guessing anymore.
Pamela

www.ThrivePersonalFitness.com

 
Oct 9, 2009 2:14pm

AGo89 AGo89
21 posts

Thanks Pamela,
The main reason I want to lose weight is (as shallow as it may be) vanity. I was 105 lbs at one point and loved the way all my clothes fit and how I looked in shorts or running tights. All around I feel better and more comfortable with myself. So if my body just doesn’t want to lose (which may be the case) then I won’t be devastated, it’s just nice to be completely comfortable with myself.

 
Oct 9, 2009 4:46pm

amclouse amclouse
3 posts

I see you have a relatively high mileage every week. Maybe you are overcompensating with what you eat for how much you exercise? Like, maybe you say you’ve ran ten miles, so you figure you could still eat a lot and not gain weight. I know I do this when I was training for my marathon. Just a suggestion! I could be totally wrong :)

 
Oct 9, 2009 5:30pm

arnthorla arnthorla
834 posts

If you have a BF% of 15! you are simply not losing because you don’t have that much to lose. I think this one is in your head.

 
Oct 9, 2009 9:22pm

davidolson22 davidolson22
131 posts

1st Qtr 2010 Most Weight Lifted I Lost 5%

After hearing you are at 15% body fat, I completely agree with Arnthorla. As a women, yo ureally don’t want to get lower than that. That’s like a guy being at 5% body fat and still obsessing about losing weight.

 
Oct 10, 2009 12:23pm

lizanneh lizanneh
757 posts

I Burned 5,000 Calories! I Lost 10 Lbs! I Lost 5 Lbs!

I agree with the others that if you are truly at 15% bodyfat, then you shouldn’t be worrying about the scale. It’s not going to be an good indicator for your fitness level. You may look fantastic in shorts at 115 pounds if your legs are strong and muscular. Try using a tape measure to keep track of your key measurements instead and track how those change over time.

That being said, we’re about the same size. I’m 5’1" and 112 lbs. When I was around 15% body fat, I was 108 lbs. I was generally wearing a size 2 or maybe a 4 depending on the brand. I’m wondering what about the fit of your clothes seems to be the problem. Are your legs more muscular than you like?

It might also be helpful to know how you estimated your body fat percentage. 15% is pretty low for a woman and I think you’d be pretty lean and fit and not have anything left to lose but muscle at that point.

http://lookinggoodmom.blogspot.com

 
Oct 10, 2009 1:20pm

AGo89 AGo89
21 posts

Hi liz,
Yeah I fluctuate between 108-110. Thats exactly it, my legs are more muscular than I’d like them to be…I don’t tumble anymore. I mainly just run distance now (half-marathons, so training for those etc.). I just incorporated HIIT into my routine this week so maybe that will help boost my metabolism. I wear a size 2, but my legs just look disproportionate to the rest of my body. I’d like leaner muscle because it is just really bulky at this point. I thought distance running would help with that, but it hasn’t.

 
Oct 10, 2009 1:37pm

davidolson22 davidolson22
131 posts

1st Qtr 2010 Most Weight Lifted I Lost 5%

If anything, HIIT would make it worse.

Are you doing squats or lunges? Those’ll make your legs big too. Long distance running, you are correct, will make your legs smaller.

 
Oct 10, 2009 3:09pm

AGo89 AGo89
21 posts

I’ve been distance running for a year now and nothing. pilates? I’ve heard that helps. Anyone? Maybe I’ll just accept it and move on. It’s 5 lbs not 50. The only hope I have with HIIT is that maybe it will help me lose the actual weight, which in turn would make my legs leaner, as that is where I gain and lose weight more than anywhere else.

 
Oct 10, 2009 7:14pm

ThriveFit ThriveFit
1015 posts

I Ran 100 Miles! I Walked 100 Miles! I Did 1,000 Pushups! I Lost 5 Lbs! Conqueror I Burned 50K Calories! Queen of upper body fitness! Elliptiqueen I Burned 25K Calories! Conqueror I Biked 100 Miles! Got Fit W/Adrianna!!! I Burned 5,000 Calories!

If your legs are really muscular maybe you should try to balance out your body with some extra upper body weight work. I know its hard, especially for us as women, to not be critical of ourselves. Just don’t be too hard on yourself because there are many women who would kill to be in the shape you are in. It’s all relative.
Pamela

www.ThrivePersonalFitness.com

 
Oct 11, 2009 8:15am

arnthorla arnthorla
834 posts

@AGo89
I second PamelaH here in going for over all balance.
.
Most long distance runners I know, as in utlra marathon runners, have muscular legs, It depends upon genetics, or say body type, where they tend to be muscular, some get huge calves and skinny thighs. Some are generally overall muscular. Marathon runners tend to be slender, but the skin and bone type is rare and more used as fodder for herding folks to do HIIT training more or less exclusively. ;)
.
So long distance running wont necessarily make your legs less muscular, might even go the other way. Seems to me that the legs tend to reach a balance in bulk, and then the development tends to be inside the muscles, not in them changing sizes. So you will probably balance out, and in my experience (from admiring female runners) will get hot legs. So no worries. ;)


Login to Reply